Share the QR code < / P > < p > with wechat scanning code to friends and circle of friends < / P > < p > < / P > < p > on September 13. At present, the practice of Android application developers trying to prevent Google from charging 30% commission through litigation is not optimistic. Because on Friday, a U.S. federal judge approved Apple's app store to charge developers similar fees < p > many developers, including Epic Games, the developer of Fortress night, targeted apple and Google App Stores last year. Critics believe that the Commission is ridiculously high. After developers have to pay billions of dollars to the two app stores every year, it is entirely the result of the monopoly of the market by two large technology companies < p > the lawsuit against Google will last at least a year. Legal experts said that the two sides of the court could use this time to discuss repeatedly on the basis of the ruling result of the apple case < p > after the trial of Epic Games v. Apple last Friday, the US federal judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple should allow developers to directly inform users of more payment channels. This led to Apple's share price falling 3.3% and Google's parent company alpha falling 1.9% < p > like apple, Google's app store also adopts similar rules for apps on the shelves to limit the communication between developers and customers. Tom forte, an analyst at investment bank D.A. Davidson, said Google's approach could also be at risk. He also said that U.S. lawmakers continue to take new regulatory actions, which will also bring more risks to Google < p > although developers have complained for a long time, judge Rogers asked developers to abide by the rules of the app store. This includes that when users pay through Apple's payment system, apple can charge developers 15% to 30% < p > Katherine Adams, Apple's general counsel, told reporters that the company was "very happy" about this. Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games & nbsp; (Tim Sweeney) said: "today's ruling is not a victory for developers and consumers." < / P > < p > Rebecca haw Allensworth, a professor at Vanderbilt law school, said that she believes that Rogers' ruling is not good for developers to sue Google, and Alston & amp; Valarie Williams, a partner in the antitrust case of bird law firm, also said that Google "may be encouraged by the result of this ruling." < / P > < p > judge Rogers said that Apple's restrictions can indeed reassure users that most of the applications they buy have no security risks, And the fees paid through Apple's payment system will not be a problem < p > Rogers wrote; "Restrictions on application distribution allow apple to filter fraud and objectionable content in the application review process, combat piracy, and put forward higher requirements for privacy protection. Apple's practice has increased security in a 'broad sense'. < / P > < p > according to Rogers's ruling, the commission charged by Apple has brought" huge profits "to the company. But Rogers said that if he forced apple to relax restrictions, it might be difficult for the company to get any compensation from the operation of the app store platform. Judge Rogers also said that Apple's selling points such as security and centralized system will also be negatively affected < p > Rogers said that 30% of the commission fee was "almost set by chance when Apple first launched the app store", rather than the result of market influence < p > according to the documents disclosed by Google in the lawsuit, the practice of Google App store is also to protect privacy and user security, and the Commission level charged for a long time has followed Apple's example < p > in view of Google's small share in the U.S. mobile application market, the plaintiff may need to find more evidence to win Google. Rogers said that any lawsuit on commission filed by Epic Games was unreasonable for apple, and Epic Games failed to provide clear evidence that Apple monopolized the market < p > in the case of developer v. Google, it may not be enough to adjust the litigation arguments. The Google case was difficult from the beginning. Android users can install applications from other sources, which makes Google naturally get rid of the debate of monopolizing the market. From the perspective of both exchanges, Google App store is also more relaxed in the implementation of some policies < p > Google, Epic Games and other lawyers suing Google App Store developers also declined to comment. The Attorney General of Utah is leading a lawsuit in the states of the United States. He said that the ruling in Epic Games v. Apple was being reconsidered. (Chen Chen) < / P > < p >