提供永久免费的API接口，查看更多API接口，如果您有其他免费API资源，请联系我们，造福人类。

定制开发，免费评估，免费咨询，价格便宜，售后保障，前往开发服务中心或联系开发客服中心

Wechat scan QR code < / P > < p > to share with friends and circle of friends < / P > < p > on June 24, revel, a start-up company, announced its plan to set up a car Hailing service in New York City with Tesla Model y electric vehicles in April this year. But on Tuesday local time, the New York City taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) voted against the plan < p > TLC's move is considered as a plan to deliberately ignore revel. In April this year, revel announced that it would launch 50 model y electric vehicles in Manhattan, New York City, to provide a car Hailing service for the public. At present, the law of New York City stipulates that taxi license shall not be issued, but the net car and electric car for wheelchair access are not included. The regulation is designed to prevent Uber and LYFT and other car Hailing service companies from adding more online car hailing in New York City. Revel's plan to launch Tesla electric vehicles appears to be exploiting loopholes in New York City's current law. But on Tuesday, New York City's TLC voted 5-1 against the exemption of electric vehicles, and revel's plan was aborted < p > now, anyone who wants to apply for a taxi license for an electric vehicle needs to wait for the results of the semi annual review like a fuel vehicle. Those who already have a fuel taxi license can voluntarily convert it into an electric vehicle license < p > aloysee Heredia jarmoszuk, Commissioner and chairman of TLC in New York City, said in a statement that "the reason why the licensing is restricted now is to restrict those enterprises that affect the existing system, aggravate traffic congestion, and put profits and business development above urban welfare. TLC is also committed to building all electric taxis in the future. The rules we put forward include pure electric vehicles in the potential demand analysis twice a year for the first time. " < p > jamozuk further elaborated this view at the meeting on Tuesday, saying that revel is a risk capital backed disruptor, which will have a negative impact on the existing taxi drivers and aggravate the traffic congestion in the city. According to the report, jamozuk said: "in cities where traffic congestion is already serious, it is not feasible to restrict new cars on the road."“ We're not going to allow new companies the chance to get more cars into our streets. " < p > revel said that the purpose of its car Hailing service is not just to let clean energy vehicles go on the road. Revel said the company plans to include drivers as regular employees rather than as independent contractors, as Uber and LYFT do. In a statement, Frank reig, chief executive of revel, attacked TLC for its lack of deliberation, saying the vote was predetermined < p > "TLC has never intended to listen to the opinions of drivers and New York people, but only care about how to pass this vote," rigee said“ This decision does not change the fact that New York City needs an alternative to the predatory taxi system. The current taxi system exploits drivers and pollutes the environment, and revel is exploring ways to achieve this. " The results of TLC also confused many people, who generally believed that the electrification of urban Taxis was good for the environment. Andrew Salzberg, a former head of transport policy at Uber, wrote an article on transport decarbonization. He said he was "surprised" by TLC's rejection of the revel plan. We certainly have reason to doubt the success of any business model, Salzberg wrote. I can't predict if Reggie and the revel team will eventually build a successful business, and many zero carbon car startups have failed this year. But the fact is that revel is willing to invest in the construction of charging infrastructure, pay reasonable compensation to drivers, purchase special electric vehicles, and try to put a little competitive pressure on Uber and LYFT's future plans to build a zero emission fleet. Why not < p > the technology industry in New York City is also criticizing TLC, calling the vote a "retrogression" in the fight against climate change. Julie Samuels, executive director of a technology advocacy group, said that "at a time when almost all New Yorkers think we should do everything possible to meet this urgent challenge," New York City TLC said, "climate change is not a priority."（ Chen Chen) < / P > < p > 1

2023-03-22 10:04:37