According to foreign media reports, on Wednesday local time, SpaceX, a US space exploration technology company, shelled Amazon in a document submitted to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), claiming that the latter's attempt to prevent the proposal to modify the plan of the star chain project was a "delaying tactic", Because it is simply unable to compete with SpaceX < p > < / P > < p > SpaceX said in the document: "Amazon's history shows that when it lags behind its competitors, the company is very willing to use regulatory and legal procedures to set obstacles to prevent these competitors from further leading Amazon. Approving Amazon's request will harm the interests of consumers and prevent them from benefiting from the competition. " < p > Amazon recently urged the FCC to reject SpaceX's plan to modify the satellite chain, because the latter "proposed two different configuration schemes for nearly 30000 satellites of its second generation satellite chain system (Gen2), and each scheme deployed these satellites according to different orbital parameters." Amazon argued that SpaceX's request violated the requirement to maintain the integrity of the application and there was no internal contradiction < p > SpaceX responded that Amazon's request would prevent the FCC from soliciting public opinions on SpaceX's application. The company said: "the FCC should recognize this delaying strategy, reject Amazon's request and quickly solicit public opinions on our modification plan. In the process of public comment, any issues are fully reviewed. " < p > Kuiper systems, a subsidiary of Amazon, plans to finally launch LEO satellites to compete with SpaceX's star chain project. However, SpaceX has launched more than 1700 satellite chain satellites and is providing beta services to more than 100000 customers, while Amazon will not start launching satellites until at least 2023 < p > SpaceX is applying for a license to launch 30000 satellite chain satellites. Previously, the company was allowed to launch nearly 12000 satellites. On August 18, SpaceX proposed a revised plan to "distribute micro by latitude more evenly by aiming at multiple inclination angles, so as to ensure better and more consistent global coverage". SpaceX said that this "will make full use of the upgraded satellite capability and the availability of interstellar spacecraft" < p > Amazon said that the proposal of the two configurations violated the provisions of the FCC, while SpaceX refuted that this statement was nonsense: "Amazon argued that our modification should be rejected because it provided information about the preferred configuration of SpaceX and alternatives. Amazon claimed that SpaceX's application failed to meet the committee's requirements for 'integrity' to some extent, but it did not specify what necessary information SpaceX failed to provide. In addition, Amazon believes that our application "hardly provides every major detail". In fact, SpaceX provided technical analysis to prove that neither configuration would cause unacceptable interference to other NGSO (non geostationary satellite orbit) and earth systems operating in this frequency band (including Amazon), and updated the orbital debris analysis of the two configurations. Amazon's argument is strange, but this is not because our application is incomplete, but because we provide too much information. " < p > SpaceX also criticized Amazon for apparently focusing more on blocking the star chain plan rather than promoting its own plan: "the FCC informed Amazon in July 2020 that the company did not provide sufficient information on how its proposed satellite system would protect other people's systems from interference, or how it would comply with FCC rules on orbital debris. Although Amazon did not submit any license to the FCC to solve these problems in nearly 400 days, it took only four days to put forward its reasons against the star chain system. In fact, Amazon has not held a meeting with the FCC on how to solve the security problem this year, but it has held 15 meetings on the SpaceX program. Although Amazon waited 15 months to explain how its system works, it raised an objection to SpaceX every 16 days this year. " < p > the July 2020 order mentioned by SpaceX approved Amazon's plan to launch 3236 satellites, but ruled that Amazon must prove its rewriteword data id = "re66422" style = "background color: #ffff04" & gt; The system plans not to interfere with other systems, provides a complete orbital debris disposal plan, and meets other requirements < p > Amazon protested that the FCC required the application to be complete and there were no internal contradictions to avoid encouraging "speculative applications". SpaceX countered that Amazon's application was speculative: "Amazon cannot explain how providing information about alternative configurations to the FCC would encourage speculation. In fact, it is often thought that Amazon would welcome flexibility because it has been very difficult to address the fundamental defects found by the FCC in its own speculative applications, and it has not even selected a launch supplier for its satellites. " < p > SpaceX said that the company provided two possible configurations for the deployment of satellite chain satellites, because the plan may change, which "depends on the development time of SpaceX's fully transparent satellites and launch vehicles. There is no doubt that the FCC needs to have the necessary funds and technology to be able to distinguish an actual system such as SpaceX from just speculative applications. " < p > SpaceX quoted the famous saying of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos when submitting the application for modification of star chain project. SpaceX told the FCC: "as the former CEO of Amazon said, procedural operations (like some of Amazon's current behaviors) have become a 'greater bottleneck than technology'." < p > musk has also publicly criticized Amazon many times in the past year, accusing it of trying to obstruct the star chain plan, and said that Bezos's space company Blue origin "should consider investing more money in the actual lunar lander hardware", rather than busy suing NASA and hiring consultants（ Small) < / P > < p >